Noise policy

Environmental noise management in Quebec and internationally

WHERE

WHEN

2018 - 2023

FUNDINGS

Quebec ministries of Health and Environment - Ministère de la Santé et des services sociaux (MSSS) and the Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques (MDDELCC).

COLLABORATORS

Thomas Dupont (ETS), Johanne Brochu and F. Hubert (ULaval)

TAGS

policy and planning
noise policy
environmental noise
policy review
best practices
noise limit
urban design
urban planning

Distribution of reviewed noise policies.

Noise is a major pollutant of our time but its regulation in policies is often reactive, rarely harmonized across provinces, states or countries, and remains siloed.

Our project offers recommendations toward an integrated, pro-active approach to environmental noise management.

Josée Laplace

ABOUT THE PROJECT

Noise policies differ around the world and even within the same country, with various provinces or municipalities within the same province taking different approaches to noise management. In Quebec, noise policies focus on reactive strategies that focus on specific sound sources and their levels (and on reducing them) that distribute responsibilities at different levels of governance.

Since 2018, Sounds in the City has been working on a review on environmental noise management. The first part of the project, in collaboration with École de Technologie Supérieure, included a systematic review of noise policies around the world to identify best practices in terms of noise limit values, measurement protocols, and communications strategies, as well as a review of how low-level government (municipalities), address noise considerations in Quebec. The second part of the project, in collaboration with Université Laval, focused on how to best integrate sound considerations in urban design and practice, through Quebec and international case studies and interview with professionals of the built environments.

The diversity of noise levels included in policies, the varied (or lacking) protocols for measuring those levels as well as the often-siloed approach focusing on specific sources (like car traffic, recreational activities, or industry) addressed at different governmental levels makes environmental noise management a global challenge and limits the transferability of certain documented good practices. We formulated recommendations for our governmental partners on strategies for integrating sound in earlier stages of, for example, planning and design and for managing noise that are not exclusively reliant on noise levels, but rather focus on communication and education.


Josee Laplace (josee.laplace@gmail.com), Edda Bild (eddabild@gmail.com)

LINKS